CANADA: WHERE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT .... UNTIL YOU DON'T
Canadians are an odd people for four reasons.
First, we're all lumberjacks. That's not entirely true. Some of the fucking thrill-seekers in Quebec trade in beaver pelts but the rest of us try not to talk about Quebec too much.
Second, each and every one of us has had out genitals genetically enhanced to previously unknown levels of fabulousness. Foreigners are known to have explosive and potentially harmful orgasms whenever they so much as see one of us naked. Frankly, I'm shocked that we're still allowed to leave the country.
Any questions regarding the above should be referred to Pamela Anderson and Peter North.
Third, the Jews don't control Hollywood, Canadians do. Rather, we did until Jim Carrey's career went south, but we still have Mike Myers and the Chinese chick on Grey's Anatomy, and Eugene Levy has been in every movie released in the last fifteen years, so I guess we still call the shots.
Fourth, the justices of our Supreme Court dress like Santa Claus and deliver particuarly weird rulings from time to time. This comes from the old English tradition of looking like a douchebag when trying to be taken seriously.
Okay, the last part was only half true. The Supreme Court of Canada delivers particularly weird rulings all the time. It's actually gotten to the point where the townsfolk are shocked when a ruling comes down that seems to follow a discernable pattern of logic.
There are a couple of reasons for this. You see, the prime minister of Canada has almost Caligula-like powers of appointment. There is no confirmation process whatsoever. Executive appointments are not subject to either review of any kind by Parliament. I'm convinced by any doubt that the only reason that crazy bastard, Jean Chretien, didn't name a horse to the Senate or Supreme Court is that its been done. To be sure, Chretien is a psychopath, but he's a psychopath with an exacting demand for originality in his weirdness.
That said, no one has any idea at all what a potiential justice's legal theories are before they take their seats on the court.
Canada also has what can only be described as a useless and odious constitution. If you actually sit down and read the Charter of Rights and Freedoms - which no rational adult should ever do sober - it looks fairly standard upon first glance. However, closer inspection reveals that it has two built in "self-desctruct" mechanisms.
The first is Section 1, which reads "The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."
That is to say that your right to, say, free speech can be limited by either an act of Parliament or a court ruling. All they need do is deem such a limit to be "reasonable" and "demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society." There is no compulsion to actually explain how such a limitation is reasonable, or how any restriction of personal freedom can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. I'm given to believe that restricting freedom has a tendency of making a society less free, rather than more. On the other hand, I'm a really bad Canadian.
Should the courts or the legislature fail to find a way to exercise even that overly broad section to fuck with you, Parliament or any provincial legislature can invoke Section 33 - the dreaded Notwithstanding Clause - to over-rule any court ruling. Your right to free speech or to free of unreasonable search and seizure can be suspended at any time, for any reason, anywhere in Canada.
Pretty sweet, huh?
Canadian jurisprudence also has no use for absolutes in protecting the rights of the people. We do have an exclusionary rule, but there is no Canadian equivilent of Mapp v. Ohio, which would dictate that any illegally produced evidence be excluded from a criminal trial. Such evidence may be excluded, but that is within the sole discretion of the trial court. Furthermore, such a ruling almost never constitutes reversible error at the appelate level.
The government of Canada and the judiciary can pretty much do whatever it wants and the people have no recourse. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is really little more than the USA PATRIOT Act writ large and dressed up in the garb of an instrument of democratic governance. According to my Supreme Court, the only inalienable right I have is to marry a homosexual. And that would be funny, if there wasn't a very real possibility that I may be forced to resort to that pretty soon. I'm awfully lonely.
And this week, the Supreme Court of Canada demonstrated yet again how seriously it takes the fundamental rights of criminal suspects and, by extension, all Canadians.
I trust that everyone has seen those cops and robbers shows on television that are ever so popular. You know how on Law & Order when the cops are interrogating a skell and said skell insists on not saying shit until his shyster comes a-callin' and everybody stops talking? That's called invoking your right to remain silent. It is seen as being a pretty important thing in the criminal justice system pretty much everywhere that pretends to respect the rights of the individual.
In the United States, it is called the Mirandarule and pretty much everyone who isn't Rudy Giuilani agrees that its a neat legal protection. And that's only because Rudy has a rather "elastic" view of what the Bill of Rights provides for.
The right to silence in Canada is not an absolute rule that requires police to stop interrogating people who have no wish to speak with investigators, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.
In a 5-4 decision yesterday, the court refused to treat the right to silence, as guaranteed by Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in the same manner as the "Miranda" rule so deeply ingrained in the United States, where police must cease questioning anyone who asserts a desire to say nothing.
"What the common law recognizes is the individual's right to remain silent," said Justice Louise Charron, who wrote the majority decision. "This does not mean, however, that a person has the right not to be spoken to by state authorities."
Essentially, getting arrested is now a lot like a child's relationship with his or her parents. Mom and Dad will keep pestering and nagging about why the cat's head is in the fishbowl, and the kid plugs his fingers in his ears and sings "I can't hear you" over and over again.
Eventually, the kid's ears and throat start to hurt, so he explains to mom and dad that his imaginary friend decapitated Garfield. Amazingly, it's almost never the imaginary friend who goes to bed without dinner.
The case at issue, Regina v. Singh is particularly enlightening in respect to what the cops are now allowed to do.
The court was sharply divided over an appeal by Jagrup Singh, who asserted his wish to remain silent no fewer than 18 times while under interrogation by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in 2002 in connection with a shooting that killed an innocent bystander at a bar in Surrey, B.C.
His questioner, Cpl. David Attew, admitted his objective was to get a confession "no matter what."
Singh eventually admitted being in the bar and identified himself in a photograph, incriminating revelations in a case where no forensic evidence linked him to the crime. He was convicted of murder in 2003.
Singh argued his statements were obtained in violation of his right to silence under Section 7 of the Charter and asked the court to adopt a rule that would require police, unless they have a signed waiver, to refrain from questioning any person who invokes that right.
You read right, Singh invoked his right to remain silent no fewer than 18 times. That's pretty impressive. Indeed, it's a number that approaches how many times I say "Wanna fuck?" over the course of a day whenever I find myself in a relationship with a woman who happens to live in the same time zone as I do. Said woman usually invokes her right to remain silent, too, although she also frequently invokes her right to call me a "brain-damaged, oversexed, mongloid monster." Then she invokes her right to tell me that her pussy hurts. When I point out that her ass looks okay, she invokes her right to throw me out of her apartment.
In their majority opinion, the Court used the most ridiculous stretch of constitutional logic I've ever heard to tell Mr. Singh to go fuck himself.
But imposing such a rigid requirement would ignore the state's important interest in solving crime and goes well beyond provisions in the Charter and common law that protect a person's freedom to choose whether to speak with police, Charron said. "One can readily appreciate that the police could hardly investigate crime without putting questions to persons from whom it is thought that useful information can be obtained," she wrote on behalf of Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and Justices Michel Bastarache, Marie Deschamps and Marshall Rothstein.
Your right to remain silent is now officially subservient to the right of the police to not have to work very hard. Your rights are now only as effective as your ability to be as much of a prick as the cops are. And it is important to remember that cops work in shifts and you don't. You can be held in an interrogation room for days.
There is no time in a person's life when his or her rights are more important than when that person is in the custody of the state. And those rights are now lawfully less important than the right of Corporal Attew to be home before dinner gets cold. That doesn't seem right to me, but I don't know all of the facts. Mrs. Attew might be a real cunt when poor Dave comes home late for his eats.
What is especially shocking is something that was pointed out in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Morris Fish.
What's "particularly disturbing," said Fish, is that Attew "subtly but unmistakably" urged Singh to forsake his lawyer's advice.
So not only is your right to remain silent gone, so is your right to to retain and instruct counsel (Section 10.b of the Charter) and the right not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against yourself in respect of the offence (Section 11.c)
What I find most troubling is the Court's endorsement of Corporal Attew's wanting to get a confession "no matter what." Would "no matter what" include slapping Mr. Singh around if he didn't talk? How about pulling out his fingernails? Sure, Singh has the right "not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment" (Section 12,) but he also used to have the right to remain silent and retain and instruct counsel.
You might be able to make a case for the "reasonableness" of continued questioning after the right to remain silent has been invoked if Jagrup Singh had, say, planted a bomb that was about to go off. And you could only make that case with any measure of self-respect if you were Jack fucking Bauer. Few of us have days as bad as he does.
But that didn't happen in this case. Singh shot somebody in a bar. Unfortunate for the victim, but a pretty commonplace occurence, all told. And for that, the RCMP decided that the Charter and decades of common law could be ignored. Remember, Attew had no idea that this case would end up in front of the Supremes and how they would rule if it did. Can you imagine what the fucking Mounties are doing in kidnapping or terrorism cases, or when they figure that no one's paying attention? Christ, I'm amazed that those assholes don't get their man more often.
Look, I don't believe that cops, Crown attorneys or judges are necessarily bad people - although they frequently are. I believe that they're just like anyone else, interested in making their day go by as quickly and easily as possible, and are willing to cut a few corners to do that. You do it and I know that I sure as shit do.
But the difference between us and law enforcement and the judicial process couldn't be more profound. When they cut corners, they undermine the freedom of the people and the fundamental building blocks of a democratic society. Do it often enough, and you create a police state, albeit an exceptionally polite one. Canada is very rapidly becoming what we so often proclaim overselves better than. A few more rulings like this one and the only significant difference between us and a country like Myanmar will be that we have a much more adorable way of pronouncing the word "about." And our fantastic genitals. One should never forget those.
This country's priorities couldn't be more retarded. Say what you will about Ronald Allen Smith, but I'm pretty sure that his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were respected in 1982 and that he received a fair trial. For all I care, Smith can be cut to pieces and fed to ferrets before he actually expires.
I trust the state of Montana enough to believe that his conviction and execution are righteous and pure. I don't trust my own government to same degree and can't therefore support the death penalty here, although I'd love to. Canadians are willing to sacrifice process at home as they whine about punishment abroad. This country's priorities are fucked.
But I'm one of those "glass half full" guys. As such, I'm pleased that the justices no longer wear those stupid goddamned wigs. They're demeaning. And if you're going to undermine the rule of law and everything democracy is supposed to stand for, it's important that you don't look silly doing so.
Easy Listening Recommendation of the Day: Breaking the Law (Live) By: Judas Priest From: Metalogy
And before you ask, yes, I do feel as gay as you do watching those Judas Priest outfits prance about, but what can I do? It's a pretty fucking cool song.
"You can count on “Skippy” to make you think in different ways about familiar issues. You can also depend on him to be rude, offensive, and outrageous – if you're offended by completely uninhibited sexual imagery (and imagination!), don't read Skippy – but your prudery will keep you from an often interesting perspective." Posted On: Jamulblog, July 12, 2007
"Your Maximum Leader is beginning to think that the less he posts, the better Skippy’s political posts are. Indeed, your Maximum Leader even thought (just a few short moments ago) that if your Maximum Leader just stopped blogging all together would Skippy just keep on writing enough good material for two blogs? (Admittedly one of those blogs would be an X-rated social commentary/diary site and the second a remarkably well-informed and insightful political commentary site…)" Posted On: Naked Villainy, September 18, 2007
"I love your writing. few could pull off sarcastic humor and self-loathing like you do. You've turned self-disgust
into an art form." Posted By:Ophelia July 19, 2003
"hahaha um, not funny" Posted By: Ophelia July 17, 2003
"This is not fucking funny." Posted By: Bee August 21, 2003
"I join Bee in saying that this isn''t funny AT ALL. jesus christ, Skippy." Posted By: Ophelia August 23,
"You are obiviously being kept down by the Mud People." Posted By: DrReverend August 21, 2003
"I''ll give you $50.00 if you kill yourself." Posted By: DrReverend August 19, 2003
"Last time I read this blog." Posted By: Dave, October 24, 2003
"I think you should stop talking about killing yourself and ACTUALLY kill yourself. For fuck's sake, everybody is
tired of hearing about how you might, just do it or face the fact that you are too pathetic to even kill yourself."
Posted By: A Caring Guy, October 25, 2003
"If Joey Ramone were alive today he'd probably shit in your mouth." Posted By: DrReverend November 11,
"When you're good, you're good. When you're bad, you're even better. See you in hell." Posted By: Anna
November 11, 2003
"Skippy, if you can prove to me that giving head and swallowing will without a doubt keep lung cancer and heart
disease at bay, you've earned yourself a BJ." Posted By: Mary Magdalicious, December 5, 2003
"Wow...you know nothing about politics." Posted Dr. Reverend, December 26, 2003
"You are a dick and should think seriously about killing your stupid blog - go get a job, you big fag"Posted
By: Princess Paragonian, December 29, 2003
"You have a, how shall i say.... appealing 'tough', yet gently gay look." (Univited PM) Posted
by:Jus20012002, January 2, 2004 .
"I hope jesus doesn't kick you in the nuts."Posted By: Mary Magdalicious February 2, 2004
"Stumbled on to your blog by accident and i must say alot of the stuff had me in stitches. Love it" Posted
By:Jeremy February 4, 2004
" .....sick."Posted By: Bee February 7, 2004
"Hey Skippy, you ever consider running for public office in the states? I know some people in the West Virginia state
government and our Senator can't live forever.Hell, even Strom, Thomas-Jefferson-Fan, Thurmond died
eventually.Posted By: Ford W. Mavrick, February 9, 2004
Wow, for someone who is so opinionated, you really don't know shit about American or Canadian culture. You appear to
know even less about history." Posted By: Dr. Reverend February 13, 2004
"Your blog's the best I have come across in a long time. I may not agree with all you say but the verve with which
you say it and the humour and irreverance is terrific. These days when the media just reproduces the handout from central
control, blogs like yours do a great deal to form informed opinion in a democratic society. Thanks. Keep it up."
Posted By:Anandan February 13, 2004
"SKIPPY pities ME? Where's my noose?" Posted By: Kilgore Trout March 22, 2004
"Jesus Skippy. Now Allah is going to kick you in the nuts" Posted By: Mary Magdalicious March 22, 2004
"I could make one that says "Skippy has a small penis" although his cock is superb. Posted By: Bestest Pussy March 23,2004
"Cunt sucking is for bitches.You're considered one of the girls because you dress like one. Posted By: Dr. Reverend March 24, 2004
"John Malkovich is one sexy bastard. I have such a thing for him. And I never realized til now, Skippy, how much you resemble John Malkovich...this, by default, makes you also one sexy bastard. See how that works?" Posted By: Zombie March, 26, 2004
"Too bad you live up north. It could have been beautiful.
Ever since I started coming here and saw your pic I wondered why you weren't getting more action. You are not a bad looking guy at all.
Maybe the girls are just...well, that's enough kindness for one day." Posted By: Serenity March 26, 2004
"Hell, if they make gay marriage legal, I'll marry you..." Posted By: Outpatient March 26, 2004
"You look creepier than the REM faggot. But he looks much more like a homersexual." Posted By: Dr. Reverend March 27, 2004
"Skippy, your hits will go up again if you post pictures of your man nipples. Lots of man nips." Posted By: Mary Magdalicious April 15, 2004
"What the fuck? You turning faggot? Posted By: Dr. Reverend April 16, 2004
"Sometimes it gets to be just a little too much. Sharing, that is." Posted By: Bee May 23, 2004
"I'll give you $5.00 if you make the fucking font you use on your blog bigger.
I'll give you $50.00 if you stop fucking writing about American politics.
I'll give you $500.00 if you fucking kill youself." Posted By: Dr. Reverend May 26, 2004
"Of course women like jerks.
Why the fuck do you think they like me?
I guess you've learned nothing from me over all these years." Posted By: Dr. Reverend May 29, 2004
"Sometimes a bitch just has to die." Posted By: Ford W. Maverick May 29, 2004
"It looks like we have more in common than the swastikas carved in our foreheads."Posted By: Dr. Reverend May 29, 2004
"This might be a shallow and 'Waiting-for-Godot-like' comment but...you seem to have not only brains but also beauty." Posted By: Nietzscheswife June 7, 2004
"Skippy, you are such a twisted bastard. Seriously. Why haven't we had sex yet?"Posted By: 0phelia June 25, 2004
"Just found your site. I find some of the things you say quite disgusting. And really quite enjoyable,so keep up the good work."Posted By: Big Al June 28, 2004
"I've read most of your blog. I'd say that so far it's the best I've come across, and believe me, I've seen a few. It's funny, well written (except for the spelling...) and interesting. There will always be those few idiots who just don't get it. It's useless to get worked up about it." Posted By: Johnny June 30, 2004
"Skippy... Go for the facial tattoo. I dig em', and fuck what those other bitches think. You can always bite their tits off if they back talk you." Posted By: Mary Magdalicious July 1, 2004
"Go fuck yourself up your butt." Posted By: Reek Stankleberry July 6, 2004
"Well if ass-fucking won't keep Satan away, I just don't know what will." Posted By: Dr. Reverend July 7, 2004
"dude, you're killing me. keep it up." Posted By: Son of Nixon July 22, 2004
"Are you always either naked or in a suit?" Posted By: Rehella July 22, 2004
"That person should speak for himself or herself. 'Cause you really are that much of a cunt, skippy." Posted By: Kilgore Trout August 4, 2004
"I've read you for a long time but have never commented before. That isn't a slight to your great writing ability, it's mainly because I don't want to be seen here!" Posted By: Paul August 4, 2004
" Dead on. Bulls-eye. I take back what I said about you being a cunt. For now." Posted By: Kilgore Trout August 4, 2004
"Know what, Skippy? You're alright." Posted By: Anna August 18, 2004
"Excellent work. Damn you for being so dead on." Posted By: The Maximum Leader August 24, 2004
"Skippy, fuck the puppy idea. Try getting a monkey that smokes. That will get you laid." Posted By: Mary Magdalicious August 27, 2004
"As to the beard - I like the clean shaven better - and what's wrong with a bald head? Bald heads are hot on some guys - unfortunately most can't pull it off * sigh * You look like you can pull it off though and that's a good thing - not a bad.
BTW, love your blog. I saw it in my referrers and thought it was just a random hit. Then I started reading and found you to be hilarious - it was only after about 10 posts that I noticed you linked me. I was more than flattered - linked by someone I was about to link anyway - awesome. Thanks" Posted By: Kinky August 27, 2004
"Fuckin' Goy bastard." Posted By: Dr Reverend December 19,2004
"Who does a guy have to sleep with to get one of his Skippy quotes pasted to the sidebar?
Great googly-moogly." Posted By: Smallholder December 20, 2004
"Are you a child molester or what's the story?" Posted By: Fukinator, December 28, 2004
"Sick dude." Posted By: DCayer December 29, 2004
"You officially suck." Posted By: Sorry, January 22, 2005
"I heart you, Skippy" Posted By: Karinsky, January 25, 2005
"As I've stated before, you were quite skilled in bed and I had no need to fake any of my multiple orgasms." Posted By: 0phelia, June 30, 2005
" You are so fucking ignorant about America. And while the American people ARE stupid, so are you." Posted By: Bill Lassiter, August 2, 2005
"How can you not love a man who hates himself so viciously?" Posted on: It's All About De , August 31, 2005
"If I wasn't positive that all Canadian men had tiny penises, I'd be all over that Skippy." Posted On: It's All About De
"I've seen pictures of you and I'd say you're fuckable." Posted By: Joan, September 29, 2005
" I love your posts on Canadian politics even more than I love your posts on porn.
And I love your porn posts.
Why the hell do you waste all this talent on the internet? Write a book or something, goddammit! Posted By: Cliff S., November 17, 2005
"Let it never be said that underneath your self-cavilling, bitter (yet strangely egomaniacal) surface that you never take the time to give the people what they want. Even if it's just one people. Gawd bless you, Skippy! Posted By: Locke, November 18, 2005
"Wow! I don't know that I've ever been flattered and yet somewhat revolted at the same time... It's an interesting sensation." Posted By: Dewey in Toronto, December 1, 2005
"Very often, debating you is like playing whack a mole: You pop up some premised assertion moles, I pull out my mallet and start whacking, then you pop up more premised assertion moles - which are mostly or completely unrelated to the original moles I was whacking at. Your stock of moles seemingly stretches into infinity. And yet, an endless supply of moles does not equate to cogent argument.
Very often, debating you is like speaking to a salesman who will not answer a particular direct question, and instead flies off on the flight of rhetorical splendor known as "baffling them with bullshit." I'm impressed with your rhetorical skills, and your IQ, and your accumulation of knowledge. I'm impressed that I'm the American citizen, yet you might have a more thorough knowledge of the American Constitution than I. And yet, these impressive things are not substitutes for cogent argument."Posted By; gcotharn, December 21, 2005
"Besides, you seem to think you're the least respectable person I know. While you're often right, you're wrong on that count. Careful, I might out YOU as a nice guy. Or something." Posted By: Dewey In Toronto, December 27, 2005
"I've been to Toronto. The most dangerous thing I saw there was an 11 foot tall red head with shaved balls."Posted By: Judy, December 31, 2005
"There was this "Caught on Tape!" video I watched back in my highschool days where one of the scenes shows two people starting to cross the railroad tracks. One looks up at the last minute and sees the train, the other does not. In the commercial, it cuts away just before the train does its thing, but the video...
Your blog is like a twisted version of the video. We know the train is going liquify you in shocking gory fashion, but that's why we keep coming back. It's so much more fun that we both know the train is coming and you still gleefully walk into its path...and we love you all the more for it." Posted By:Locke, January 13, 2006
"Fuck. I'm hooked." Posted By: DeAnna, January 14, 2006
"Your Maximum Leader has found Skippy's commentary more insightful and interesting than anyone elses. So now he supposes that Skippy will go back to writing about porn and strippers he meets in the subway." Posted By: The Maximum Leader on Naked Villainy January 24, 2006
"Slightly crazed is fine, but with the beard you look like a total nutjob. If you ever hope to get laid again, for fuck's sake, Skippy, NEVER, EVER grow a saddam beard. You're welcome."Posted By: The Lady O, 28 January, 2006
"Maybe we should get married. My readers could support us by purchasing my worn panties and you could be the panty pimp." Posted By; Joan 28 January 2006
" I know it must be hard for you...being objectified by women all the time. But come on, how can they really help themselves? Have you seen yourself lately? Your pheramones preceed you into a room (as does your crotch). Don't blame it all on them...you did choose to leave your house. :D" Posted By: Joan, 3 February, 2006
"Skippy, you sarcastic twerp." Posted By: Arwen, 8 February 2006
"Just so you know.. if I had to choose between Moussaoui or Skippy.. You'd win. Even if I know what an asshole you are. Posted By; Judy, 13 February 2006
"I'd be willing to sign a legal document stating that is IS ok, in fact, to masturbate whilst thinking of me." Posted By: DeAnna (Who seems unaware of my reputation as an outlaw) February 24, 2006
"Feel free to masturbate while thinking of me...actually, do you need some of my panties to help you with that?" Posted By: Joan, February 24, 2006
"I blame myself for this. I have been too lenient with you. Your Godless behaviour must come to an end. You will receive a severe beating this weekend and I am contemplating removing your testicles." Posted By: Dr. Reverend, February 24, 2006
"Just remember skippy, the US never threw a fit when you smuggled your own personal WMD over the border twice a year. After all, it wasn't like you were hiding in your pants or anything.
All's fair in love and war, so to speak." Posted By: Judy, April 4, 2006
"Wow...nothing hotter than a man willing to issue fatwas for pussy." Posted By: Joan, April 16, 2006
"You sir, are a brilliant writer." Posted By: Judy, May 4, 2006
"I think I'm falling in love." Posted By: DeAnna, May 11, 2006
"THIS IS THE MOST DIABOLICAL FALSITY YOU HAVE EVER ENGAGED IN!!!!
I was intending to kick you in the face upon our next meeting, but now it's obvious that I must douse your scrotum in kerosene and set your testicles aflame. Alas, it is the only way you will learn." Posted By: Dr. Reverend, May 12, 2006
"And i would like to commend you on some excellent blogging. This particular story would normally warrant a few cryptically humorous lines and a link. To an ordinary blogger. But you managed to wring an essay of New Yorker-esque proportions out of it. That takes talent. Your beautiful young friend is right. I see big things for you in the future." Posted By: Annika, June 4, 2006
" I like a man who will unabashedly tell someone his penis size because hes unashamed. Thats hot.
*raises hand* I'll take that 6.5, thank ya" Posted By: Kinky, June 6, 2006
"Elvis, like skippy, is the very definition of rock and roll. Posted By: Rube, June 10, 2006
" I'm beginning to think you're the only good man left in the world, skippy. WTF?" Posted By: By: DeAnns, June 11, 2006
"Just so everyone knows.
Skippy does indeed, taste like bacon.
And, any guy who doesn't know cum tastes good to real women, is clueless." Posted By: Judy, July 2, 2006
"There was a British columnist whose work was described as 'a suicide note in weekly installments.'
This blog is sort of like that." Posted By: Gadfly, July 6, 2006
"Jeez, Skippy. Sometimes I really hate coming here." Posted By: Cynlee, July 18, 2006
"Someone needs to throttle you with a riding crop...truly!" Posted By: Joan, July 18, 2006
"Holy mother of god. I just had an orgasm. It's official: I'm devoting the rest of my life to you, skippy." Posted By: DeAnna, July 19, 2006
"Skippy, sometimes I'm not quite sure of your sanity, but you are without a doubt the baddest morning news reading, quiz show hosting, talent introducing PIMP in the motherfuckin' blogosphere." Posted By: Shank, July 19, 2006