Photobucket Enjoy Every Sandwich



Sunday, May 25, 2008


AT LONG LAST, CALIFORNIA, HAVE YOU NO DECENCY?

If you're looking for a place that embodies everything that is wrong with the human spirit, you probably aren't going to do better than California. It is a land that has been made ungovernable by Hiram Johnson's softheaded vision of popular democracy, and allows brainless shills like Barbara Boxer not only to walk about unmolested, but to prosper.

California is the world's seventh largest economy, and its leading export is pretending. So important is the vapid emptiness of Hollywood to California that the state has been governed by not one, but two actors.

Despite its enormous wealth, the state of California hemorrhages money in ways that President Bush probably masturbates at night thinking about.

Way back in 1978 the retard voters of California passed something called Proposition 13, which inhibited the ability of the county and state governments to raise revenue to a degree that no right-thinking person would ever agree to. But that didn't stop the worthless jackals of the Land of Sunshine from demanding increased services from its government.

Oh no, at the same that revenue was restricted, discretionary spending went through the fucking ceiling. Idiot Californians couldn't stop bitching about their need of dumb things like schools and police. And artificially low property taxes have only served to make California real estate prohibitively expensive for almost everyone on the planet.

Proposition 13 was little more than a microcosm of what the presidency of George W. Bush would eventually embody; limited revenue, relentless spending and endless debt.

California is to responsible democracy what 2 Girls, 1 Cup (link truly revolting and stunningly NSFW) is to love. And the reaction of everyone who sees it is pretty much the same. (YouTube video below is also NSFW.)




But California is notable for one thing. It produces the best goddamned pornography in the world. Some gentleman prefer European porn, but I find that the women aren't as cute and the abundance of cock is disturbing. Also, things that aren't in English bother me. Then there's Japanese porn, but the kind of person who gets off on watching a girl stuff an eel inside of herself is the kind of person who votes for Proposition 13.

That's why American porn is the greatest porn in the world. They find the Girl Next Door and ensure that she gets thoroughly hosed down in seed, but they don't get all weird about it, like the Europeans and Japanese do. With American porn, you can jack off seventeen times an hour without feeling guilty about it later. That's more important than I can tell you. Guilt is an emotion best left for sexual encounters with another person.

Simply put, Californians are to pornography what the Swiss are to watches and chocolate. For that reason, the pornography industry makes approximately $3 billion a year more than mainstream Hollywood.

It therefore stands to reason that the California legislature is ready to kill the goose that caused the golden hard-on.

California state lawmakers are considering an unusual idea to solve the state's huge budget shortfall: Tax pornography.

The idea was proposed by a state assemblyman, and would impose a 25 percent tax on the production and sales of pornographic videos -- the vast majority of which are made in southern California.

The ultimate "sin tax." Cute idea.

A 25% tax should never be recognised as remedy to a government's budget imbalance. It's punitive, pure and simple. Imagine if you will such a proposal to tax any other industry at that rate. Republicans and conservatives would go batshit fucking insane because of the possibility that the industry would move or jobs would be lost. Christ, the state of California doesn't even tax cigarettes at that high a rate.

This isn't new or exceptionally original. The state of California and the local governments have been trying to shut down its pornography industry for decades. The LAPD was so intent on it in the early 70s that the industry relocated to the more tolerant San Francisco. It was only after the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. California (1973) that they started to cool the fuck out.

Since Miller, successful obscenity prosecutions have been few and far between and guess what? The industry pumps approximately $13 billion dollars a year into the economy.

It is unknown, however, how seriously lawmakers will take the idea or how the porn business would deal with the new tax. It is likely, though, that porn-makers would simply pass the cost along to consumers by making pornographic materials more expensive.

However, many economists believe that pornography is an industry with inelastic demand -- meaning market conditions typically don't affect consumers' desire for the product. In other words, it is believed that most porn consumers would continue to buy regardless of how much it cost.

As always, "many economists" are wrong. Not about "inelastic demand," mind you. People like to watch hot girls fuck far too much to let something as trivial as taxes stop them. The taxes could be even higher if assfucking is involved. Not too very long ago, pre-Miller, obscenity laws were structured in such a law that jail time was a very real possibility. A stupid 25% tax isn't going to change that.

What the economists fail to recognize is that the proliferation of large computer hard drives and cheap broadband has made buying pornography almost redundant. I haven't physically bought pornography in almost two years, but I have over 200 gigs of it on this computer as I write this. The proposed California tax would only hasten the day that everyone does.

There's another small problem with this tax. In so far as the industry is becoming increasingly digital and being distributed on the Internet, just as Al Gore intended, there is a decreasing share of the market that produces and sells in the traditional sense. Internet sales are currently exempt from the sales tax in the United States.

And that's what this might be, a way for California to start taxing the Internet. Because most people are remarkably stupid, they aren't going to object to a "porn tax." But if you consider that an increasing percentage of the market is web-based, the idea that net sales are going to have to be taxed is inescapable. And once you acclimate the public to the idea of Internet taxes, they become much easier to expand.

And then there's another response that the industry can take: they can pack up and leave California entirely. Remember, when the LAPD became too bothersome, it decamped to San Francisco. Nevada happens to be much closer to Los Angeles than San Francisco is, and already has legalized prostitution. You think they're going to freak out over the making of fuck movies in Clark County? I don't.

That would leave California without a goose or a golden egg. And you'd think that those assholes would know that already. Wasn't a big part of Governor Schwarzenegger's platform during the 2003 recall election the loss of California's jobs and industries due to heavy taxation and regulation? The problem is that the governor and legislature couldn't or wouldn't stop spending money and Prop 13 limits their ability to raise property or sales taxes. So they rely far too much on "sin taxes."

I have both philosophical and practical problems with sin taxes. First, I do not believe that the tax code is the proper instrument of behavior modification. Taxes should serve as a revenue raising device to fund the building of roads and killing of brown people, no more, no less.

Second, once the government has a fiscal interest in an activity, they necessarily have to allow it to flourish, thus negating the stated purpose of the tax. If the government was truly interested in stopping, say, smoking, they'd eliminate the subsidy to tobacco farmers. Get rid of those and let the market decide. Condemning something you profit from is a morally tenuous position. But you can't subsidize on one end, tax on the other, and still pretend that you're trying to limit the activity itself. Well, I guess that you can. Governments have been doing it for forty years now.

Then there's the obvious question of whether the state of California really wants to have a fiscal stake in Briana Banks' continued ability to take a rock hard cock in her dumper. If so, shouldn't Arnold Schwarzenegger be the one pulling her hair? How about Cruz Bustamante? He could use a job.

Frankly, I think that pornography should be exempt from taxation the way that educational materials like books are. There's just so much you can learn from porn that you can't learn anywhere else. Most women will never sit down and teach you how to lick their cooters in a way that'll make their heads explode, but Janine Lindemulder or Felicia will be more than happy to show you. Any number of women will tell you that sodomy "hurts too much," but I've seen Nikita Denise take two cocks in her ass at the same time, so I know that most women are irredeemable liars. Or Nikita Denise is a super hero.

Peter North should be personally exempt from all taxes; federal, state and local, for the important public service he provides in hosing bitches down with his copious cumshots. On the other hand, I resent that he has a wang that makes mine look even more like an infant's than it already does, so I'm conflicted.

Having said all of that, I'm actually surprised that the Bush Justice Department, in their mindless and unconstitutional decency crusade, hasn't proposed using the tax code to shut down the pornography industry in its totality. Since the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has found the monstrous and wrong 2257 regulations unconstitutional, the administration is running out of criminal enforcement ammunition in their war on fun.

However, if the tax code were used, it would circumvent any First Amendment challenge. The Constitution is explicit in saying that Congress can tax anything it wants. It's right there in Article I. While taxation would have the effect of stifling free speech, that wouldn't be the stated purpose of the levy. Therefore, it would almost certainly survive any constitutional challenge.

I'm so much smarter than the Bush administration. Now I just have to figure out why I'm giving those ghouls ideas. I should really stop doing that.

Easy Listening Recommendation of the Day: The Girls of Porn By: Mr. Bungle From: Mr. Bungle

Permalink

Labels: , ,

12:26 AM